paper.tex

% SPDX-FileCopyrightText: Copyright (c) 2020-2026 Yegor Bugayenko
% SPDX-License-Identifier: MIT

\documentclass[acmsmall,nonacm,11pt]{acmart}
\settopmatter{printfolios=false,printccs=false,printacmref=false}
\makeatletter\let\@authorsaddresses\@empty\makeatother
\usepackage[noframes,nonumbers,nobars,samepage]{/code/ctan/ffcode/ffcode}
\usepackage{/code/ctan/stroke/stroke}
\usepackage{natbib}
\usepackage{doi}
\usepackage{multicol}
\usepackage{eolang}
\usepackage{href-ul}
\usepackage[capitalize]{cleveref}
\usepackage{to-be-determined}
\usepackage[utf8]{inputenc}
\usepackage[T2A,T1]{fontenc}
\usepackage[russian,english]{babel}
  \DeclareFontFamilySubstitution{T2A}{LinuxBiolinumT-TLF}{LibertinusSans-TLF}
  \renewcommand\ttdefault{cmtt}
% stmaryrd (loaded by eolang) lacks a 5.5pt design size for scriptscript math
\DeclareFontFamily{U}{stmry}{}
\DeclareFontShape{U}{stmry}{m}{n}{%
  <5><6><7><8><9><10>gen*stmary%
  <5.5>stmary5%
  <10.95><12><14.4><17.28><20.74><24.88>stmary10%
}{}
\usepackage{csquotes}
\setlength{\footskip}{13.0pt}

\newcommand\deff[1]{\ff{#1}}
\newcommand\adeff[1]{\ff{#1}}

\newcommand\broken{\tbd{This section is not valid, must be rewritten!}}

\title{Reducing Programs to Objects}
\subtitle{
  Ver:
  \texorpdfstring{
    \href{https://github.com/REPOSITORY/releases/tag/0.0.0}
      {\ff{0.0.0}}
  }{0.0.0}
}
\author{Yegor Bugayenko}
\affiliation{\institution{Huawei}\country{Russia}\city{Moscow}}
\email{yegor256@gmail.com}

\begin{abstract}
C++, Java, C\#, Python, Ruby, and JavaScript are the most
  powerful object-oriented programming languages if language power
  is defined as the number of \emph{features} available to a programmer.
This abundance of features makes their programs hard to reason about,
  to optimize, and to debug, and---unlike functional programming with
  its \(\lambda\)-calculus---object-oriented programming has no minimal
  foundation to which its programs can be lowered.
\eolang{}, on the other hand, is an object-oriented programming language
  with a reduced set of features: it has nothing but objects
  and mechanisms of their composition and decoration.
This paper asks the following research question: ``Which known features
  are possible to implement using only objects?''
\end{abstract}

\begin{document}
\raggedbottom

\maketitle

\input{sections/introduction}
\input{sections/features}
\input{sections/related-work}
\input{sections/conclusion}

\raggedright
\bibliographystyle{ACM-Reference-Format}
\bibliography{bibliography/main}

\end{document}