feat: add wit_work_item_template tool for retrieving work item templates

[Ross Smith (ross-p-smith)]

GitHub issue number

#1689

Associated Risks

At the moment, this is Read only

✅ PR Checklist

• I have read the contribution guidelines
• I have read the code of conduct guidelines
• Title of the pull request is clear and informative.
• 👌 Code hygiene
• 🔭 Telemetry added, updated, or N/A
• 📄 Documentation added, updated, or N/A
• 🛡️ Automated tests added, or N/A

🧪 How did you test it?

I haven't :-(

[Codecov Comments Bot (codecov-commenter)]

Codecov Report

❌ Patch coverage is 87.50000% with 1 line in your changes missing coverage. Please review.
⚠️ Please upload report for BASE (main@1b4d442). Learn more about missing BASE report.

Files with missing lines	Patch %	Lines
src/tools/work-items.ts	87.50%	0 Missing and 1 partial ⚠️

Additional details and impacted files

@@           Coverage Diff           @@
##             main    #1690   +/-   ##
=======================================
  Coverage        ?   99.87%           
=======================================
  Files           ?       23           
  Lines           ?     2348           
  Branches        ?      726           
=======================================
  Hits            ?     2345           
  Misses          ?        0           
  Partials        ?        3           

Flag	Coverage Δ
unittests	99.87% <87.50%> (?)

Flags with carried forward coverage won't be shown. Click here to find out more.

☔ View full report in Codecov by Harness.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

🚀 New features to boost your workflow:

• ❄️ Test Analytics: Detect flaky tests, report on failures, and find test suite problems.
• 📦 JS Bundle Analysis: Save yourself from yourself by tracking and limiting bundle sizes in JS merges.

[Dan Hellem (danhellem)]

Ross Smith (@ross-p-smith) per contribution guidelines, Issue must be reviewed and approved first before creating a PR. For this particular issue, we do not have plans to bring the work item templates in. We will keep an eye on the feedback though and if we get more folks asking for it, we will certainly reconsider.